Yashua warns us to be on the look out for these false prophets. They are not going to have a sign on them that says that they are ravening wolves. They will be in sheep’s clothing, so on the outside they may seem innocent or righteous. It will not matter all the altruistic deeds they say they’ve done, one needs to recognize them by their fruits. Saul of Tarsus openly says a lot of things that sounds good, and pats himself on the back quite a bit, but the problem is that he’s the only one that does so.

Matthew 7:15-20
15Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
16Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
20Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

Setting aside the numerous lies, contradictions, heretical teachings and twisting of scripture (which I’ll address in future articles), I’ll focus on why Saul of Tarsus could not have been an apostle of Yashua based solely on his behavior which I find unbecoming of a disciple of Yashua, much less an apostle. Forget for a moment all the good he tells you he’s done and how everyone praises this person and let’s examine the fruit he bore.

Next >> Reason #1

Print Friendly